Te early 2015, some te the bitcoin trading community sharply criticized Bitfinex CSO Phil Potter after he disclosed that he wasgoed trading on the exchange during a conversation on Whale Club.

Spil news major bitcoin exchange Bitfinex wasgoed robbed of more than $60m proceeds to geluidsweerkaatsing across the media, less clear for many is who – and what – is at the center of this story.

Based ter Hong Kong, Bitfinex wasgoed the largest bitcoin exchange by US dollar volume prior to the hack. Since opening te 2012, the exchange has attracted a clientele looking to corner a chunk of the growing market for leveraged trading amid declining volatility ter the bitcoin price.

The exchange would go on to develop a positive reputation among traders for peer-to-peer margin trading facilities that suggested users access to a key source of liquidity. According to exchange and trading experts, it wasgoed this facet that both fueled rente ter the toneelpodium and talent traders a reason to very first engage on the webstek.

BTC VIX, an admin at bitcoin trading club Whale Club, believes that this innovation helped boost the exchange’s profile.

He told CoinDesk:

“That wasgoed utterly valuable because it wasn’t just, wij’re permitting margin trading and margin comes from some magic funds. Wij actually witnessed that people were willing to lend their funds and have other people engage ter margin trading.”

At the same time, recurring toneelpodium issues drew criticisms, sparking the moniker “Bugfinex” among some segments of the community on social media.

Bitfinex also made a name for itself by way of its staff and the connection with Whale Club (not to be confused with trading toneel Whaleclub), the bitcoin-centric trading community that, more often than not, hosted exchange staffers for talks about the marketplace.

Beyond an exchange, Bitfinex became a focal point for the development of bitcoin’s trading market, perhaps exemplifying both the best and the most controversial aspects of the space.

But that success now suspends ter the recuento.

Last week, the exchange lost almost 120,000 bitcoins ter a hack observers say has led Bitfinex into uncharted waters on reglamentario and regulatory fronts.

A fresh project to effectively bail-in the service by forcing a 36% haircut – while also issuing a cryptographic token tied to future revenues – has also raised questions across the industry.

Strange beginnings

The origins of Bitfinex commence with a lesser-known exchange called Bitcoinica.

Bitfinex is essentially the reborn version of that earlier exchange, spil it used its source code spil a fundament for its verhoging. Sources at the time indicate that it wasgoed less than a year after Bitcoinica’s fall that Bitfinex opened for business.

Launched ter late 2011, Bitcoinica sought to position itself spil a location for sophisticated trading activities, suggesting leveraged trading options to users.

Yet within a year of its launch, the exchange suffered a debilitating theft that resulted ter the loss of more than 43,000 BTC (worth $200,000). Spil Ars Techina reported at the time, the incident included the theft from the toneel itself. Other users are believed to have lost smaller amounts.

Related movie:


But the thefts didn’t end there.

Weeks zometeen, a 2nd incident resulted ter the loss of more than Eighteen,000 BTC (worth close to $90,000 at then-current prices). Bitcoinica wasgoed subsequently taken offline, and soon after accusations began to fly that founder Zhou Tongschar himself wasgoed behind the theft.

Traders te the community say one of Bitfinex’s early moves spil an exchange wasgoed to build its order book, a process that essentially entailed drawing liquidity from bitcoin exchange Bitstamp. The exchange would go on to alter the code and zometeen looked at using AlphaPoint for its back-end infrastructure, however that initiative fell to the wayside during initial testing.

Exchange at a glance

Prior to going offline, Bitfinex suggested trading inbetween digital and government-issued currencies. The exchange primarily served spil a place for the trading of bitcoin and US dollars, tho’ other digital currencies like litecoin and ether (and straks ethereum classic) were ultimately added.

Users can deposit funds and trade inbetween those pairs, or borrow funds from one another te a peer-to-peer style to engage ter that activity spil well.

But while this information is public, the exchange wasgoed not the most open te its public presence.

It’s since come to light that Bitfinex, according to its now widely circulating terms of service, is registered te the British Cherry Islands under the name iFinex Inc, with subsidiaries Bitfinex ter Hong Kong and BFXNA ter the US.

More is known about its team, some of whom were vocal on message boards and other focal points for traders.

Gegevens from LinkedIn points to a globally distributed Bitfinex team, including founder Raphael Nicolle, who is based ter France, and director of community and product development Zane Tackett, based te San Francisco.

Several executives and others tied to the exchange are also based te the California region. Thesis include director of applications Drew Samsen, based te Orange County, and Craig Sellars, who has advised the exchange te the past.

Others te the Bitfinex orbit are based elsewhere te the world, including CSO Phil Potter, based ter Fresh York, and director of infrastructure Adam Chamely, who is te Atlanta, LinkedIn profiles expose.

Representatives have said ter the past that the exchange is self-funded, a position driven by trading volume and the fees collected overheen time.

Further, the exchange has moved to invest te other services te the digital currency ecosystem. Thesis include ShapeShift, the digital currency exchange that raised $1.6m ter funding last September, and Netki, an identity-focused startup that raised $Three.5m te July.

Operational problems

For all its success te attracting users to the toneelpodium, Bitfinex wasgoed dogged by technical issues, a characteristic that traders say fostered concerns among some segments of the community and, ultimately, led others to look for alternatives ter the exchange ecosystem.

The exchange experienced periods of downtime that it attributed to gegevens center problems, API issues and gegevens corruption. While any webstek is prone to technical problems, it wasgoed the recurring nature of thesis situations that led to the “Bugfinex” moniker.

Some of thesis problems have impacted the price of bitcoin itself.

Te August of last year, Bitfinex closed its order books due to what it said were post-processing problems, a stir that came a week after a “flash crash” on the exchange sent bitcoin markets nosediving. Issues reported at the time were attributed to the AlphaPoint integration Bitfinex had undertaken.

That integration itself would prove problematic, traders say, tho’ the justification wasgoed clear – the podium needed to be scaled.

Tho’ parts of the system were brought online, issues with how the integration affected the exchange’s ordering system are said to have fated the initiative.

Continued criticism

Day-to-day problems aside, the exchange has has stoked its share of criticism and controversy since it very first opened its doors.

Commentators took kwestie with Bitfinex’s use of the Bitcoinica source code soon after it entered beta testing. Ter early , some ter the bitcoin trading community sharply criticized Bitfinex CSO Phil Potter after he disclosed that he wasgoed trading on the exchange during a conversation on Whale Club.

Exchange representatives straks moved to clarify Potter’s remarks, telling that they believed its staff can and should have access to the trading toneel, albeit under the supervision of administrators.

Still, the exchange faced accusations of privileged trading, evoking memories of Mt Gox and allegations of manipulated trading that were straks confirmed after the Japanese bitcoin exchange collapsed.

Te late , rumors surfaced that the exchange wasgoed being investigated by the US Commodity Futures Trading Commission after a leaked email began circulating via social media.

The agency, one of several that regulates commodities trading ter the US, would go on to fine Bitfinex $75,000, drawing kwestie with how it held custody overheen user funds prior to the settlement.

Related movie:


Uncharted waters

One way to look at the history of bitcoin is through the success (and failures) of its exchange ecosystem, and for better or for worse, Bitfinex now occupies a controversial spot ter that history.

Last week’s theft is unlikely to instantly spell doom for the exchange, traders say, tho’ the success or failure of its recovery project and the controversial token it has issued will no doubt have a significant influence.

Te the instant term, from the trader perspective, getting access to as-yet-unreleased funds is the key creador.

Bitfinex could proceed to operate given the attraction of the kleuter of margin trading it offers, but whether traders will stir to pull funds or proceed to support the company remains to be seen.

Correction: This article has bot updated to keurig information regarding Bitfinex’s corporate registration and subsidiary structure.

The leader te blockchain news, CoinDesk is a media outlet that strives for the highest journalistic standards and abides by a rigorous set of editorial policies. CoinDesk is an independent operating subsidiary of Digital Currency Group, which invests te cryptocurrencies and blockchain startups.

4 comments

  1. Can’t be my internet connection because everything is working fine… even Losbreken, which is (wasgoed?) notoriously unreliable

  2. Mikaela Mushroom

    agatha90 – has bot tested on Bittrex with driver’s license for three days

  3. Yes, bitfinex is indeed back. I wasgoed laughing out noisy about John McAfee attempting to FUD some investors that this exchange wasgoed hacked after hours of delay, but the bitfinex proprietor proved that there wasgoed no hacked involved.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*